Coffman Commentaries on the Old and New TestamentISAIAH 48
"Here we have a recapitulation of the preceding eight chapters, closing with a summons to flee Babylon, and a solemn declaration excluding the ungodly from a share in the promises."F1 The chapter falls into three divisions: "Each commencing with a call on Israel to pay attention: (1) `Hear ye this ...' (Isaiah 48:1-11); (2) `Hearken unto me ...' (Isaiah 48:12-15), and (3) `Come ye near unto me, hear ye this ...' (Isaiah 48:16-22)."F2
The chapter is definitely addressed to two classes of people, namely the true believers, referred to here as "Israel," and the wicked and rebellious majority, called Jacob. The student will at once see this as a departure from what many of the commentators say, namely that Jacob and Israel are two words for the same people in a rhetorical device known as a hendiadys. As we view it, this is simply not the case at all. In Babylon, there were the fleshly descendants of Jacob (the fleshly Israel), and also there was the true Israel of God, those who believed the promises and faithfully waited for the Lord's deliverance. "Jacob was their secular and natural designation, and Israel was their spiritual or covenant name."F3 See my note under Isa. 40:27.
That both of these groups are addressed in this chapter is certain, because there are wonderful promises for the covenant people and terrible denunciations for the hypocritical majority.
The first division (Isaiah 40:1-11) is clearly directed at the wicked and rebellious majority:
Verses 1, 2
Hear ye this, O house of Jacob, who are called by the name of Israel, and are come forth out of the waters of Judah; who swear by the name of Jehovah, and make mention of the God of Israel, but not in truth, nor in righteousness (for they call themselves of the holy city, and stay themselves upon the God of Israel; Jehovah of hosts is his name):
The captive Jews addressed in these words were consummate hypocrites, supposing that they were the darlings of heaven merely because they were literally descended through Abraham and Jacob. They were the Old Testament examples of those same vicious murderers of the Son of God who bragged about being "Abraham's seed" in John 8:33ff. O yes, they felt very secure because they frequently used the name of Jehovah and claimed as their very own the God of Israel, the prophecy here reminded them that the God of Israel was none other than Jehovah of hosts, a term "especially connected with the holiness of God."F4
I have declared the former things from of old; yea, they went forth out of my mouth, and I showed them: suddenly I did them, and they came to pass. Because I knew that thou art obstinate, and thy neck is an iron sinew, and thy brow brass; therefore I have declared it to thee from of old; before it came to pass I showed it thee; lest thou shouldest say, Mine idol hath done them, and my graven image, and my molten image, hath commanded them.
Things from of old
(Isaiah 48:3). What were these? They number in the hundreds, or even more. God prophesied the multiplication of Abraham's children through Isaac, at a time long before Isaac was even born; he prophesied the four hundred year period of Israel's sojourn in Egypt; he prophesied their delivery out of Egypt; he prophesied that they would leave Egypt with great riches. He prophesied that they would indeed inherit the land of Canaan. Could such prophecies have been after the event? Preposterous! Why should Abraham have bought a tomb in Canaan many centuries before his people were scheduled to inherit Canaan? Furthermore, God prophesied that if Israel rebelled against his law, he would pluck them off the land, carry them far away, and scatter them all over the world. Did God miss it on any of these prophecies? They are mentioned here in order to convince Israel of the truth of God's Word. It is a measure of their obstinate brazen faced hypocrisy that they still needed convincing!
The tendency of Israel to idolatry was one of the principal characteristics of the chosen people. Their unbelief is indeed a marvel. It is a measure of their perversity that, "The argument from the fulfillment of prophecy, hitherto directed against the heathen (Isa. 41:21ff), must now be directed against God's own people, now become determined skeptics."F5
Thou hast heard it; behold all this; and ye, will ye not declare it? I have showed thee new things from this time, even hidden things, which thou hast not known. They are created now, and not from of old; and before this day thou heardest them not; lest thou shouldest say, Behold, I knew them. Yea, thou heardest not; yea, thou knewest not; yea, from of old thine ear was not opened: for I knew that thou didst deal very treacherously, and wast called a transgressor from the womb.
The scriptures here confront the fundamental truth of the excessive wickedness of the chosen people. Moreover, "This is not a new trait with them; they've been that way from the beginning. When Jacob, their father, was given a name which means `cheater' and `guile,' the name well described him and his descendants as well. Ezekiel in Ezek. 16 and Ezek. 25 bluntly tell the story of a wicked nation whose history is one shameless narrative."F6 Even in the times of Jesus, the nation showed no improvement; because, one day when a true Israelite, an honorable and truthful man by the name of Nathaniel, came to Jesus, Christ pointed him out as something of a phenomenon, saying, "Behold! an Israelite in whom is no guile!" (John 1:47).
The words thus far in this chapter give the reason for subsequent developments in the ranks of the captive nation. We should always remember that, "The great mass, even of Judah, no less than of Israel `remained behind' in Babylon, where they came more and more to be assimilated by and identified with paganism."F7 Josephus tells us that, when Cyrus gave his decree authorizing the return of the Jews to Jerusalem, that, "Many of them stayed in Babylon, as not willing to leave their possessions."F8 He gave the number of returnees as 42,462; and a combination of the statements by Biblical writers sets the number at about 52,000; but neither of these totals, nor even the adding of them together, gives us a numerically significant number when compared with the millions that once constituted Israel. The captive nation under Cyrus, having achieved a local acceptance which they wanted, simply joined up with their pagan captors and became, themselves, a part of Babylon.
(Isaiah 48:6). What are these? The new revelation could not possibly have been the deliverance from captivity. That a remnant would return had been prophesied ever since Isaiah named his first son; and, therefore, we hold that the new things mentioned here refer primarily to the marvelous revelation of the Saviour under the figure of the Ideal Servant, which revelation would occupy the foremost place in the second section of these last 27 chapters. I have showed thee new things is therefore prophetic and shows that the new things will reach into the far future. The statement that they are created now, and not from of old is a reference to their revelation to Israel; because all of the things of the new covenant were planned in the heart of God, before the world was.
For my name's sake will I defer mine anger, and for my praise will I refrain for thee, that I cut thee not off. Behold, I have refined thee, but not as silver; I have chosen thee in the furnace of affliction. For mine own sake, for mine own sake, will I do it; for how should [my name] be profaned? and my glory will I not give to another.
Right here is God's answer as to "Why?" he had refrained from destroying a reprobate and sinful nation who fully deserved such a destruction, no less than it had been deserved by Sodom and Gomorrah. Dummelow pointed out that God's refinement of Israel was unlike the refinement of silver, that is, the removal of all the dross, "would have meant the destruction of Israel."F9 There is no question whatever as to whether or not Israel deserved total destruction, because their wickedness even exceeded that of Sodom and Gomorrah, as Ezekiel reported in Ezek. 16. Why, then did God not do it? The abbreviated answer is that to have done so would have endangered, or perhaps destroyed, God's plan of human redemption. God had promised that through the patriarchs Messiah would be born, through whom all the families of the earth were to be blessed; very well, the destruction of Israel would have checkmated the achievement of the birth of Messiah through the posterity of Abraham, or at least rendered it impossible to be proved or documented. Therefore, "for the sake of God's promises," he was stuck with Israel until the Eternal purpose had been realized.
Note the question here, "How should my name be profaned?" the argument here is exactly the same as that of Moses is Num. 14:13ff, to the effect that if God should execute upon Israel the destruction they deserved, the pagans would declare that it was because God was unable to save them from destruction; and the pagans would have heralded Israel's destruction as a victory of their idols over Jehovah! Moses' argument prevailed with God at that time; and this passage shows that the argument was still valid in the times of Isaiah. Lowth gave the meaning of Isa. 48:11 thus: "God would not destroy Israel, that he may not be blasphemed."F10
Hearken unto me, O Jacob, and Israel my called: I am he; I am the first, I also am the last. Yea, my hand hath laid the foundation of the earth, and my right hand hath spread out the heavens: when I call unto them, they stand up together. Assemble yourselves, all ye, and hear; who among them hath declared these things? He whom Jehovah loveth shall perform his pleasure on Babylon, and his arm [shall be on] the Chaldeans. I, even I, have spoken; yea, I have called him; I have brought him, and he shall make his way prosperous.
Again it is evident that the Lord is addressing both the righteous and wicked elements of Israel, Jacob the fleshly Israel, and Israel the covenant people; and this is another appeal for the people to behold how powerless and worthless their idol gods really are. Which of them ever prophesied a thing like the fall of Babylon to Cyrus? As Dummelow pointed out, despite the name of Cyrus not appearing here, it is evident enough that Cyrus "is the one spoken of."F11
God's designation of Cyrus in these chapters is amazing: He is referred to as God's `called,' as God's `anointed,' as God's `arm' upon Babylon, and as God's `beloved' (Isaiah 48:14). Note the promise that Cyrus' way shall be `prosperous' (Isaiah 48:15). Herodotus reported that, "Throughout Cyrus' life he received no check of any kind until his last expedition in which he lost his life. His `prosperity' was beyond that of almost any other commander in human history."F12
As Barnes declared:
"None of the astrologers, soothsayers, or diviners of Babylon had been able to foretell the expedition of Cyrus and his capture of Babylon; for, if they had been able to foresee the danger, they might have guarded against it, and the city might have been saved. But God had predicted it a hundred fifty years before it happened, thus demonstrating that he alone is God."F13
Come ye near unto me, hear ye this; from the beginning I have not spoken in secret; from the time that it was, there am I: and now the Lord Jehovah hath sent me, and his Spirit.
This verse is often made the first verse in the second address, and by some, the last paragraph in the first address. We agree with the American Standard Version paragraphing which treats it as the last verse of the first section; but due to its importance we shall discuss it separately. The fact of the obvious prophecy of the Son of God as having been sent to our world by the Father certainly identifies it as among the "new things" mentioned in Isa. 48:6. And, like almost every other prophecy of Christ in the Old Testament, it is subject to all kinds of interpretations. Calvin and many other scholars have seen it as a prophecy of the sending of Isaiah. Barnes agreed with this, stating that, "The scope of the passage demands, it seems to me, that it should be referred to the prophet Isaiah."F14 However, we believe that Hailey is correct in his declaration that, "The coming of Jesus is the theme of this prophecy; the entire Old Testament looks forward to Christ's coming to carry forward the purpose of Jehovah; and the Holy Spirit would accompany Christ on that mission, and then complete the work after the Son's return to the Father; let it be remembered that the prophecy is here declaring new things to come in the future."F15 Lowth explained the passage thus: "Who is it that saith in Isaiah, `And now hath the Lord sent me and his Spirit'? in which, as the passage is ambiguous, is it the Father and the Holy Spirit who hath sent Jesus; or the Father who hath sent both Christ and the Holy Spirit? The latter is the true interpretation."F16 The Father sent Jesus when he was born in Bethlehem; and the Father sent the Holy Spirit upon the occasion of the baptism of Christ (Matthew 3:16). Thus, as Kidner put it, "This is a glimpse from afar of the Trinity."F17 As Cheyne expressed it, "I cannot but think that we have both here and in Gen. 1:2 an early trace of what is known as the Christian doctrine of the Holy Spirit."F18
The speaker here is therefore, the pre-incarnate Christ who identifies himself as the one sent ... to convey God's message of salvation to mankind. Here is almost the equivalent of another Old Testament quotation, Ps. 40;6-8, where again the pre-incarnate Christ is the speaker, and his subject the projected visitation of our poor earth by the Dayspring from on High. The author of Hebrews discussed this at length (Hebrews 10:5-7). See my comment on this in Vol. 10 of the New Testament Series (Hebrews), pp. 213ff.
Jamieson, noting that Isaiah, not Christ, is the author of the passage, stated that, "Isaiah here speaks not in his own person so much as in that of the Messiah, to whom alone, in the fullest sense, the words apply."F19
Thus saith Jehovah, thy Redeemer, the Holy One of Israel: I am Jehovah thy God, who teacheth thee to profit, who leadeth thee by the way that thou shouldest go. Oh that thou hadst hearkened to my commandments! then had thy peace been as a river, and thy righteousness as the waves of the sea: thy seed also had been as the sand, and the offspring of thy bowels like the grains thereof: his name would not be cut off nor destroyed from before me.
This is a remarkable expostulation which reminds us of the words of Christ himself in his lament over Jerusalem. "Oh, if thou hadst known the things that belong unto thy peace in this thy day, but now are they hidden from thine eyes!" It appears from what is said here that God's promise to Abraham that his posterity should be as the stars of heaven the sands of the seashore, etc., that the greater fulfillment was lost forever in the multiple rebellions of obstinate and stubborn Israel. How evident this must have been in that pitiful little handful of a once mighty nation that returned from the captivity in Babylon. As Kelley stated it, however, "Even the best teacher fails, when his pupils are unwilling to learn."F20 The tragedy of Israel could easily have been avoided; but the prophet reminds her that all of her past history was one unending tragedy of squandered opportunities. "This, of course, places the responsibility of Israel's tragic state squarely upon the people themselves."F21
The final clauses of Isa. 48:19 are very important. They state clearly and emphatically that "Israel's name has been cut off and from God as a people; their name has been cut off, the Jews are no longer God's people, although they shall always exist as a race,"F22 or at least until "the fullness of the Gentiles be come in" (Romans 11:25).
Go ye forth from Babylon, flee ye from the Chaldeans; with a voice of singing declare ye, tell this, utter it even to the end of the earth: say ye, Jehovah hath redeemed his servant Jacob. And they thirsted not when he led them through the deserts; he caused the waters to flow out of the rock for them; he clave the rock also, and the waters gushed out. There is no peace, saith Jehovah, to the wicked.
These final words of the chapter again reveal the dual nature of the people addressed: singing and joy for the obedient, returning home to Jerusalem, and the forfeiture of peace forever on the part of the wicked who will remain in Babylon rather than obey the Lord's commandment to "flee from the Chaldeans."
Many commentators stress the fact that there is no record of God's performing miracles such as those stressed in Isa. 48:21 for the Jews on their way to Jerusalem; this, of course, does not mean that nothing of that nature happened; but we believe that it would not have required such literal fulfillment as that which most certainly occurred in the wilderness of Israel's wanderings on the way from Egypt to the land of Canaan in order to satisfy what was prophesied here. The fact that the greatest king of that age would send them with full authority back to their homeland, even paying a very substantial part of the expenses -- that was just as wonderful, and just as much the work of God as was the miracle when Moses struck the rock and the water gushed out!
Archer's summary of this paragraph is:
"This prophecy was written 150 years beforehand to Jews who would be captives in the year 539 B.C. not to tarry on the pagan soil of Babylon, but to take advantage of Cyrus' permissive edict to return to Jerusalem. They were to bear triumphant testimony before the Gentiles as they celebrated deliverance and recalled Jehovah's mercies to their fathers."
Those who would not flee the defilements of Babylon would never know the peace of God .F23
This concludes the first of the three sections of Division VI of this great prophecy; and this final little paragraph is absolutely, "The climax of Isa. 40--48."F24
Those who obey the Lord and return to Jerusalem will be blessed; but those who reject God's command to leave Babylon will forfeit the peace of God forever.
Christians must not forget that they also are commanded to come out of the current Babylon. "Come forth, my people, out of her, that ye have no fellowship with her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues" (Revelation 18:4).
(The end of Section A of Division VI)
Footnotes for Isaiah 48
1: T. K. Cheyne's Commentary, Vol. II, p. 1.
2: Pulpit Commentary, Vol. II, p. 214.
3: T. K. Cheyne's Commentary, Vol. II, p. 1.
4: Pulpit Commentary, Vol. II, p. 214.
5: The New Bible Commentary, Revised, p. 615.
6: Jim McGuiggan, 240.
7: Delitzsch as quoted by Pulpit Commentary, Vol. II, p. 215.
8: Flavius Josephus, Antiquities, p. 322.
9: J. R. Dummelow's Commentary, p. 444.
10: Robert T. Lowth, Isaiah with Notes, p. 345.
11: J. R. Dummelow's Commentary, p. 444.
12: The Pulpit Commentary, p. 216.
13: Albert Barnes' Commentary, p. 191.
14: Ibid., p. 192.
15: Homer Hailey, p. 400.
16: Robert T. Lowth, Isaiah with Notes, p. 346.
17: The New Bible Commentary, Revised, p. 616.
18: T. K. Cheyne's Commentary, Vol. II, p. 7.
19: Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown's Commentary, p. 484.
20: Broadman Bible Commentary (Nashville: Broadman Press, 1971), p. 327.
21: Homer Hailey, p. 402.
23: Wycliffe Old Testament Commentary, p. 643.
24: The New Layman's Bible Commentary, p. 805.