Coffman Commentaries on the Old and New TestamentJOSHUA 12
With this chapter the first half of the Book of Joshua is completed, and appropriately enough, this first section is concluded with a broad summary of the Conquest of Canaan. This conquest required a long war of at least seven years duration, and the Book of Joshua does not present any thorough history of that war, but rather confines its report to those events of particular bearing upon Israel's relation to God, and to His redemptive purpose for mankind. This first half of the book deals principally with Israel's taking of the land of the Canaanites, and the second half of it is concerned chiefly with the division of the territory of Canaan among the individual tribes. "The first part of the book closes with Joshua's triumph, and the second ends with the record of his death."F1
This chapter begins with a description of the Trans-Jordanian (eastward) conquests of Sihon and Og by Moses and Israel and the settlement of the two and one half tribes east of Jordan, as allowed by Moses. The author here evidently had two purposes in view by his placement of Josh. 12:1-6, as suggested by Woudstra, as follows: (1) "To draw a parallel between Moses and Joshua, and (2) to stress the unity of all Israel."F2
In the second division of this chapter (Joshua 12:7-24); (1) "The kings in Southern Canaan are listed first (Joshua 12:9-16); and (2) the kings in Northern Canaan are listed last."F3
Longacre attributed this chapter, indeed the first half of Joshua, to, "JE, RD, and P;"F4 and Morton thought this chapter came from "D."F5 Our own opinion is that it came from JOSHUA! We cannot believe that P, or D, or J, or E, or R, or any of the rest of those imaginary writers were eye-witnesses or participants in the events here outlined. More recent scholarship is beginning to see the impossibility of receiving such allegations regarding the source of Biblical books. Boling, for example, writes: "It must be admitted, however, that there is no direct evidence to show that the label `P' (or any other label, J.B.C.) must be placed on this chapter."F6 The death of all allegations of various sources for Biblical books is in three simple words: NO DIRECT EVIDENCE! Furthermore, we declare unequivocally that "there are no prior documents that were copied to make up the holy Bible." If Biblical enemies want to get their "prior sources" accepted by believers, let them produce the documents! Joshua is simply not a piecemeal kind of book. As Lilley put it, "The overall effect (of merely reading it) emphasizes the unity of the book."F7
Now these are the kings of the land, whom the children of Israel smote, and possessed their land beyond the Jordan toward the sunrising, from the valley of the Arnon unto mount Hermon, and all the Arabah eastward: Sihon king of the Amorites, who dwelt in Heshbon, and ruled from Aroer, which is on the edge of the valley of the Arnon, and [the city that is in] the middle of the valley, and half Gilead, even unto the river Jabbok, the border of the children of Ammon; and the Arabah unto the sea of Chinneroth, eastward, and unto the sea of the Arabah, even the Salt Sea, eastward, the way to Beth-jeshimoth; and on the south, under the slopes of Pisgah: and the border of Og king of Bashan, of the remnant of the Rephaim, who dwelt at Ashtaroth and at Edrei, and ruled in mount Hermon, and in Salecah, and in all Bashan, unto the border of the Geshurites and the Maacathites, and half Gilead, the border of Sihon king of Heshbon. Moses the servant of Jehovah and the children of Israel smote them: and Moses the servant of Jehovah gave it for a possession unto the Reubenites, and the Gadites, and the half-tribe of Manasseh.
(Joshua 12:3). This body of water is called Chinneroth, Tiberias, Gennessereth, and Galilee in the Bible, also with variations of Sea of ... or Lake ... in each instance. The Sea of the Arabah is the Dead Sea. Pisgah was a dramatic promontory overlooking the Arabah, which is the great rift in the earth in which the whole Jordan and the Dead Sea are found. Pisgah lay near the northeastern corner of the Dead Sea.F8 `Beth-jeshimoth' means `house of wastes,'F9 an appropriate name indeed for a strip of land lying northeast of the Dead Sea and adjacent to it; It is described by travelers as the most arid portion of the whole land.F10
As for the scope of the territories that belonged to Sihon and Og, they may be described thus: between them, they controlled all of the Trans-Jordan eastward from the Jordan Valley, with the Jabbok river lying between their territories. Og controlled the northern area as far as mount Hermon, and Sihon controlled the southern sector south of the Jabbok. The mention of "half of Gilead," indicates that the rather indefinite area called "Gilead" was divided about equally between Sihon and Og. (For further details regarding the conquest of Transjordania eastward, see notes, above on Deuteronomy, chapters 2 and 3. Also, see Vol. 3 in this series of commentaries, under Num. 21.)
(Joshua 12:4). These were one of the various tribes of giants, like the Anakims, Zuzims, Emims, of whom we read in the land of Canaan.F11 It is of interest here that Og had two palaces, living both at Ashtaroth and Edrei. Matthew Henry commented that, Israel took both from him, and made one grave to serve him that could not be content with one palace!F12
Verses 7, 8
And these are the kings of the land whom Joshua and the children of Israel smote beyond the Jordan westward, from Baal-gad in the valley of Lebanon even unto mount Halak, that goeth up to Seir; and Joshua gave it unto the tribes of Israel for a possession according to their divisions; in the hill-country, and in the lowland, and in the Arabah, and in the slopes, and in the wilderness, and in the South; the Hittite, the Amorite, and the Canaanite, the Perizzite, the Hivite, and the Jebusite:
These verses are the beginning of a very long sentence running through Josh. 12:24, in which are recorded the 31 kings and their cities which were destroyed by Joshua and their land given to Israel. The first thing one encounters in the study of this is that there are a number of kings, along with their cities, which are not mentioned in the previous chapters, where is found a more detailed account of the overthrow of the majority of these. Cook explained this thus:
"Those cities mentioned in Josh. 12:10-18 either belonged to the league of the Southern Canaanites, the power of which was broken in the battle of Beth-horon, or were at any rate conquered in the campaign following the battle. Those mentioned in Josh. 12:19-24 were in like manner connected with the northern confederates who were defeated at the Waters of Merom."F13
Significantly, Bethel is among the cities not previously mentioned as having been conquered by Joshua; but it will be recalled that in our study of the destruction of Ai, the defense outpost associated with Bethel, and located almost adjacent to it, that we speculated that it was at that very same time that Bethel and its king were also destroyed, the whole narrative of Joshua existing in the form of a general summary, rather than as a detailed account of everything that happened. This chapter confirms the probability of that being indeed the character of this book, i.e., a general summary, not a detailed account of everything.
Due to the nature of the remaining material in this chapter, we shall rely upon a different method of presenting it. Woudstra, and others, have also utilized this manner of reporting it:F14
the king of Jericho.....................one
the king of Ai, beside Bethel...........one
the king Jerusalem......................one
the king of Hebron......................one
the king of Jarmuth.....................one
the king of Lachish.....................one
the king of Eglon.......................one
the king of Gezer.......................one
the king of Debir.......................one
the king of Geder.......................one
the king of Hormah......................one
the king of Arad........................one
the king of Libnah......................one
the king of Adullam.....................one
the king of Makkedah....................one
the king of Bethel......................one
the king of Tappuah.....................one
the king of Hepher......................one
the king of Aphek.......................one
the king of Lasharon....................one
the king of Madon.......................one
the king of Hazor.......................one
the king of Shimron-meron...............one
the king of Achshaph....................one
the king of Taanach.....................one
the king of Megiddo.....................one
the king of Kedesh......................one
the king of Jokneam in Carmel...........one
the king of Dor in Naphath-dor..........one
the king of Goiim in Gilgal.............one
the king of Tirzah......................one
Together -- thirty-one kings
A number of scholars refer to the Septuagint (LXX) in connection with this list, but we can see no reason for this. "The Septuagint says, `twenty-nine kings,' and then sets down only twenty-eight, omitting the kings of Bethel, Lasharon, and Madon."F15 It would be impossible to find a more interesting list of names in ancient Palestine than the one here.
the king of Jericho, one; the king of Ai, which is beside Bethel, one; the king of Jerusalem, one; the king of Hebron, one; the king of Jarmuth, one; the king of Lachish, one; the king of Eglon, one; the king of Gezer, one; the king of Debir, one; the king of Geder, one; the king of Hormah, one; the king of Arad, one; the king of Libnah, one; the king of Adullam, one; the king of Makkedah, one; the king of Bethel, one; the king of Tappuah, one; the king of Hepher, one; the king of Aphek, one; the king of Lassharon, one; the king of Madon, one; the king of Hazor, one; the king of Shimron-meron, one; the king of Achshaph, one; the king of Taanach, one; the king of Megiddo, one; the king of Kedesh, one; the king of Jokneam in Carmel, one; the king of Dor in the height of Dor, one; the king of Goiim in Gilgal, one; the king of Tirzah, one: all the kings thirty and one.
This was the place of Israel's entry into Canaan. The name of the place probably signifies some ancient moon god, and its history reaches back some 5,000 years!F16 It owes its existence to a marvelous spring that supplies an abundance of fresh water. Here Jesus Christ himself healed the blind beggar Bartimaeus (Mark 10:46ff). Here Jesus ate with the chief tax-collector Zacchaeus (Luke 19:1-10). And the memory of a palace in Jericho was still in Jesus' mind when he spoke the parable of the pounds (Luke 19:11-27). (See my comment under these references in the N.T. series of commentaries.)
In Hebrew, the name is always written with the definite article, The Heap, or the Ruin. It is identified with the modern `Et Tell' (Arabic: tall heap), two miles east of Bethel (Tell Beitin).F17 Here the events regarding Achan occurred.
Called by Jesus himself, The City of the Great King, from the days of the Monarchy, Jerusalem and its history are indeed the history of Israel. Here the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ occurred.
(See my notes on this under Josh. 10:1.)
(See my notes on this place under Josh. 10:3.)
(See my notes on Lachish under Josh. 10:3.)
(See my notes regarding Eglon under Josh. 10:3.) It is of interest that a king of Moab by the name Eglon was assassinated by Ehud (Judg. 3:12ff).
From the earliest times Gezer was an important city on the road between Joppa and Jerusalem. The Egyptians recaptured Gezer following the Conquest (about 1224 B.C.); and the place did not again become a possession of Israel until the times of Solomon, when Pharaoh gave it to his daughter, one of the wives of Solomon. Solomon fortified the place and rebuilt it; and it figured extensively in the Maccabean wars.F18
Kiriath-sepher was an ancient name of this place which was a stronghold of the Anakim, located possibly a few miles from Hebron (Noth). It is unmentioned in later history.F19
This is a southern town of Canaan, the location of which is unknown.
This place was the farthest south to which the victorious Israelites chased the defeated Canaanites following the battle of Beth-horon. The ancient name of it was Zephath. Judg. 1:17 mentions it in the episode of its defeat by Judah and Simeon.F20
The battle that destroyed this place and its king took place in Hormah (the ancient Zephath, as described in Judg. 1:17). Way identified the place as the modern Tell es Seriah, 15 miles southeast of Gaza.F21
This was a fortified city on the Shephelah (the plateau-like area between the high mountains of central Palestine and the seacoast). Joshua assigned it to the priests. It withstood a siege by Sennacherib; and it was here that Sennacherib's army was destroyed on a single night by an angel of the Lord (2 Kings 19:8).F22
We first hear of this place in Gen. 38, where Hiram the Adullamite is the friend of Judah. David hid there from king Saul (1 Sam. 22:1ff). Ps. 52 and Ps. 142 were written here, and it was one of the places occupied by the returnees from Babylon (Nehemiah 11:30).F23
Makkedah means the cave, and was the place chosen by the five kings of Hazor's confederacy for a hiding place from Joshua. They were executed and buried in that same cave. The location of the place is not certainly known, but it is supposed to be some seven or more miles from the Mediterranean coast in the vicinity of Aijalon.F24
Bethel is located at the modern Tell Beitin 12 miles north of Jerusalem on the high ridge road. Abraham built an altar here; Jacob had his vision of the ladder here, and set up a pillar. He returned to Bethel after the disaster at Shechem; Jeroboam set up pagan worship at Bethel; and the place figured prominently in the writing of the Minor Prophets.F25
This means Apple-city. It was apparently near Lasharon and seems to have been an important city.F26
This appears from 1 Kings 4:10 to have been near to Socoh, but nothing more is known of it.F27
There were several towns of this name ... There is no certainty about which is meant.F28
Sarona, between Mount Tabor and the Sea of Tiberias 6.5 miles southwest of Tiberias may be the Biblical La-Sharon.F29
(See my notes under Josh. 11:5.)
(See my notes above, under Josh. 11:5.)
This is probably identical with the Shimron in the territory assigned to Bethlehem (Joshua 19:15), about 3 miles south-southeast of Bethlehem, but this is disputed.F30
(See my notes under Josh. 11:5.)
The Israelites defeated this city and executed its king; the place was assigned to Manasseh, but they were unable to take possession of it and keep it (Josh. 12:21; 17:11; and Judg. 1:27).F31 It was located on the southern edge of the valley of Jezreel and guarded a pass over Mount Carmel. It is right here that we begin to see the need of Israel for those troops that were in Trans-Jordania eastward. Half of Manasseh was there, instead of here; and so the choice of those two and one half tribes was indeed a terrible hindrance to Israel in the subjugation of Canaan.
This city was associated with Taanach; the name means Stronghold. Together these two places, assigned to Manasseh, controlled the southern flank of the valley of Esdraelon and the most heavily traveled route through the Carmel range to the plain of Sharon. Manasseh was also unable to hold on to this.F32
This place must not be confused with a Kedesh in the north. This one was located between Taanach and Megiddo, in the neighborhood of Tell Abu Qudeis.F33
This place was assigned to Zebulun near the border with Manasseh.F34
Dor in Naphath-dor
This name has the meaning of The Dune of Dor, and is a reference to the famous sea coast town south of Carmel. It was the capital of Solomon's fourth administrative district (1 Kings 4:11), and was important enough to be governed by one of Solomon's sons-in-law.F35
Goiim in Gilgal
The meaning of these words is nations in Gilgal, and most of the commentators cannot understand any meaning at all in the expression. Blair said, The expression is unintelligible.F36 There is probably a textual problem here. The LXX has, king of Goiim of Galilee, and later translations prefer this. Woudstra probably has the best solution, proposing that, This may be the same as Galilee of the Gentiles (Gentiles and nations have the same meaning).F37 Matt. 4:15 has this very expression, Galilee of the Gentiles. This indeed may refer to a place which had a king and which is mentioned here. Besides that, the use of nations in the titles of some of those ancient kings was nothing unusual, for example, Tidal, king of nations (Genesis 14:1).
This place was the capital of the kings of Israel for a time during the events related in 1 Kings. Jeroboam's wife went there after her interview with Ahijah (1 Kings 14:17); Baasha dwelt there (1 Kings 15:21); Elah was slain there by Zimri (1 Kings 16:9,10); and it remained the capital until Omri built Samaria.F38
Here concludes the summary of the mighty victories of Joshua. "This list is a song of praise to the Lord's honor."F39 If Israel was to be protected against the seduction to the sensuous debaucheries of paganism, it was absolutely necessary that the inhabitants of Canaan be destroyed.
"Joshua was the man destined by God to carry out his program. He is not to be blamed for the severity with which he acted. Not only did he show exemplary faithfulness to the Divine command, but he also remained true to his given word in the case of Rahab and the Gibeonites, and without partiality applied the curse to Achan, one of Israel's own."F40
These great victories under Joshua are a pledge that God will always fight upon the side of, and in the interests of those who truly love him. "And we know that to them that love God, all things work together for good, even to them that are called according to his purpose" (Romans 8:28).
Footnotes for Joshua 12
1: Lindsay B. Longacre, Abingdon Bible Commentary, Joshua (New York: Abingdon Press, 1929), p. 353.
2: Marten H. Woudstra, The New International Commentary on the Old Testament, Joshua (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1981), p. 200.
3: John Rea, Wycliffe Bible Commentary, Joshua (Chicago: Moody Press, 1962), p. 221.
4: Lindsay B. Longacre, op. cit., p. 253.
5: William H. Morton, Beacon Bible Commentary, Joshua (Nashville: Broadman Press, 1970), p. 348.
6: Robert G. Boling and G. Ernest Wright, Joshua, a New Translation With Introduction and Commentary (Garden City, New York: Doubleday and Company, Inc., 1982), p. 322.
7: John Lilley, The New Layman's Bible Commentary, Joshua (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1979), p. 322.
8: William H. Morton, op. cit., p. 349.
9: Robert G. Boling, op. cit., p. 324.
10: Alfred Plummer, The Pulpit Commentary, Joshua (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1950), p. 205.
11: Ibid., p. 206.
12: Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible, Joshua (New York: Fleming H. Revell Company), p. 69.
13: F. C. Cook, Barnes' Notes, Joshua (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House), p. 381.
14: M. H. Woudstra, op. cit., p. 204.
15: Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Whole Bible, Joshua (New York: T. Mason and G. Lane, 1837), p. 58.
16: K. A. Kitchen, The New Bible Dictionary, Jericho (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1970), p. 611.
17: A. R. Millard, The New Bible Dictionary, Joshua (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1970), p. 22.
18: M. A. McCloud, The New Bible Dictionary, Gezer (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1970), p. 465.
19: J. P. U. Lilley, The New Bible Dictionary, Debir (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1970), p. 302.
20: Ibid., p. 537.
21: R. J. Way, The New Bible Dictionary, Arad (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1970), p. 55.
22: J. P. U. Lilley, op. cit., p. 734.
23: Alfred Plummer, op. cit., p. 207.
24: Ibid., p. 773.
25: A. R. Millard, The New Bible Dictionary, Bethel (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1970), p. 143.
26: Alfred Plummer, op. cit., p. 207.
29: J. D. Douglas, The New Bible Dictionary, Lasharon (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1970), p. 717.
30: K. A. Kitchen, op. cit., p. 1178.
31: A. R. Millarck op. cit., p. 1251.
32: Robert G. Boling, op. cit., p. 329.
35: Ibid., p. 306.
36: Hugh J. Blair, The New Bible Commentary, Revised, Joshua (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1970), p. 245.
37: Marten H. Woudstra, op. cit., p. 206.
38: Alfred Plummer, op. cit., p. 208.
39: Ibid., p. 200.