The New John Gill Exposition of the Entire BibleDaniel 5:1
Belshazzar the king made a great feast…
This king was
not the immediate successor of Nebuchadnezzar, but Evilmerodach,
(Jeremiah 52:31) , who, according to Ptolemy's canon, reigned two years; then
followed Neriglissar, his sister's husband, by whom he was slain, and
who usurped the throne, and reigned four years; he died in the beginning
of his fourth year, and left a son called Laborosoarchod, who reigned
but nine months, which are placed by Ptolemy to his father's reign, and
therefore he himself is not mentioned in the canon; and then followed
this king, who by Ptolemy is called Nabonadius; by Berosus, Nabonnedus
F20 by Abydenus F21, Nabannidochus; by Herodotus F23, Labynitus; and by
Josephus F24, Naboandelus, who, according to him, is the same with
Belshazzar; whom some confound with the son of Neriglissar; others take
him to be the same with Evilmerodach, because he here immediately
follows Nebuchadnezzar, and is called his son, (Daniel 5:11,13,18) , and
others that he was a younger brother, so Jarchi and Theodoret; but the
truth is, that he was the son of Evilmerodach, and grandson of
Nebuchadnezzar, which agrees with the prophecy in (Jeremiah 27:7) , for though
Nebuchadnezzar is called his father, and he his son, (Daniel 5:2,11,13,18,22)
this is said after the manner of the eastern nations, who used to call
ancestors fathers, and their more remote posterity sons. He had his name
Belshazzar from the idol Bel, and may be rendered, "Bel's treasurer":
though, according to Saadiah, the word signifies "a searcher of
treasures", of his ancestors, or of the house of God. Hillerus
translates it, "Bel hath hidden". This king
made a great feast;
or "bread" F25, which is put for all provisions; it
was great, both on account of plenty of food, variety of dishes, and
number of guests, and those of the highest rank and quality. On what
account this feast was made is not easy to say; whether out of contempt
of Cyrus and his army, by whom he was now besieged, and to show that he
thought himself quite safe and secure in a city so well walled and
fortified, and having in it such vast quantities of provision; or
whether it was on account of a victory he had obtained that morning over
the Medes and Persians, as Josephus Ben Gorion F26 relates; and
therefore in the evening treated his thousand lords, who had been
engaged in battle with him, and behaved well: though it seems to have
been an anniversary feast; since, according to Xenophon and Herodotus,
Cyrus knew of it before hand; either on account of the king's birthday,
or in honour to his gods, particularly Shach, which was called the
Sachaenan feast; (See Gill on 25:26)
(See Gill on 51:41) which seems most likely, since these were
praised at this time, and the vessels of the temple of God at Jerusalem
profaned, (Daniel 5:2-4) , this feast was prophesied of by Isaiah,
(Isaiah 21:5) and by Jeremiah, (Jeremiah 51:39) , it had its name from Shach,
one of their deities, of which (See Gill on 1:4)
(See Gill on 1:7) the same with Belus or the sun. The feasts kept in
honour of it were much like the Saturnalia of the Romans, or the Purim
of the Jews; and were kept eleven days together, in which everyone did
as he pleased, no order and decorum being observed; and, for five of
those days especially, there was no difference between master and
servant, yea, the latter had the government of the former; and they
spent day and night in dancing and drinking, and in all excess of riot
and revelling F1; and in such like manner the Babylonians were
indulging themselves, when their city was taken by Cyrus, as the above
writers assert F2; and from the knowledge Cyrus had of it, it appears
to be a stated feast, and very probably on the above account. According
to Strabo F3, there was a feast of this name among the Persians, which
was celebrated in honour of the goddess Anais, Diana, or the moon; and
at whose altar they placed together Amanus and Anandratus, Persian
demons; and appointed a solemn convention once a year, called Saca. Some
say the occasion of it was this; that Cyrus making an expedition against
the Sacse, a people in Scythia, pretended a flight, and left his tents
full of all provisions, and especially wine, which they finding, filled
themselves with it; when he returning upon them, finding some overcome
with wine and stupefied, others overwhelmed with sleep, and others
dancing and behaving in a bacchanalian way, they fell into his hands,
and almost all of them perished; and taking this victory to be from the
gods, he consecrated that day to the god of his country, and called it
Sacaea; and wherever there was a temple of this deity, there was
appointed a bacchanalian feast, in which men, and women appeared night
and day in a Scythian habit, drinking together, and behaving to one
another in a jocose and lascivious manner; but this could not be the
feast now observed at Babylon, though it is very probable it was
something of the like nature, and observed in much the same manner. And
was made "to a thousand of his lords"; his nobles, the peers of his
realm, governors of provinces…; such a number of guests Ptolemy king
of Egypt feasted at one time of Pompey's army, as Pliny from Varro
relates F4; but Alexander far exceeded, who at a wedding had nine (some
say ten) thousand at his tables, and gave to everyone a cup of gold, to
offer wine in honour of the gods F5; and Pliny reports F6 of one
Pythius Bythinus, who entertained the whole army of Xerxes with a feast,
even seven hundred and eighty eight thousand men.
And drank wine before the thousand;
not that he strove with them who
should drink most, or drank to everyone of them separately, and so a
thousand cups, as Jacchiades suggests; but he drank in the presence of
them, to show his condescension and familiarity; this being, as Aben
Ezra observes, contrary to the custom of kings, especially of the
eastern nations, who were seldom seen in public. This feast was kept in
a large house or hall, as Josephus F7 says, afterwards called the
banqueting house, (Daniel 5:10) .
F20 Apud Joseph. contr. Apion. l. 1.
F21 Apud Euseb. Evangel. l. 9. c. 41. p. 457.
F23 Clio, sive l. 1. c. 188.
F24 Antiqu. l. 10. c. 11. sect. 2.
F25 (Mxl) "panem", Montanus, Piscator. All food is called bread, Jarchi
in Lev. xxi. 17.
F26 Hist. Hebr. l. 1. c. 5. p. 24.
F1 Athenaei Deipnosophist. l. 14. c. 10. ex Beroso & Ctesia.
F2 Xenophon. Cyropaedia, l. 7. c. 23. Herodot. Clio, sive l. 1. c. 191.
F3 Geograph. l. 11. p. 352, 353.
F4 Nat. Hist. l. 33. c. 10.
F5 Plutarch. in Vit. Alexand.
F6 Ut supra. (Nat. Hist. l. 33. c. 10.)
F7 Antiqu. l. 10. c. 11. sect. 2.
The New John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible Modernised and adapted for the computer by Larry Pierce of Online Bible. All Rightes Reserved, Larry Pierce, Winterbourne, Ontario.
A printed copy of this work can be ordered from: The Baptist Standard Bearer, 1 Iron Oaks Dr, Paris, AR, 72855
Gill, John. "Commentary on Daniel 5:1". "The New John Gill Exposition of the Entire Bible". <http://classic.studylight.org/com/geb/view.cgi?book=da&chapter=005&verse=001>. 1999.