The New John Gill Exposition of the Entire BibleLuke 18:2
Saying, there was in a city a judge…
In every city
in the land of Israel, there was a sanhedrim, or court of judicature;
in Jerusalem was the great sanhedrim, consisting of seventy one; and
in every city where there were an hundred and twenty men, or more,
there was a lesser sanhedrim, consisting of twenty three; and in a
city in which there were not an hundred and twenty men, were three
judges; for there was no sanhedrim, or court of judicature, that
consisted of less than three F12: but
``although there is no judicature less than three, (Nwrl dxal)
(rtwm) , "it is lawful for one to judge", according to the
law, as it is said, (Leviticus 19:15) "In righteousness shalt thou
judge thy neighbour"; but according to the words of the
Scribes, (only,) when there are three, and two that judge,
their judgment is no judgment: one who is publicly
approved or authorized, or who has taken a licence from
the sanhedrim, it is lawful for him to judge alone, but it
is not accounted a judicature; and though it is lawful, it
is the command of the wise men, that he set others with
him; for lo, they say, do not judge alone, for there is
none that judgeth alone, but one F13.''
It may be, this judge was, (hxmwm) , an authorized and approved one;
however, we have instances of single judges, or of persons that have
judged alone, at least by the consent of parties.
``R. Abhu was sitting judge, in a synagogue in Caesarea, by
himself, his disciples said to him, did not Rabbi so teach
us, do not judge alone? he replied to them, when ye see me
sit judge by myself, and ye come to me, as those that have
taken upon themselves (or agreed to be judged by me); for
the tradition is, of things in which they do not take upon
them; but if they take upon them, (or agree to be judged,)
one may judge, though alone F14.''
And again, elsewhere F15;
``if he is publicly authorized or approved, he judges,
though alone; says R. Nachman, as I judge pecuniary causes
alone; and so says R. Chijah, as I judge pecuniary
judgments alone. --Mar Zutra, the son of R. Nachman,
judged a cause, and erred; he came to R. Joseph, who said
to him, if they have received thee upon them (agreed to be
judged by thee) thou needst not finish; but if not, go and
The qualifications of one to be a judge, even of the bench of three,
were these F16;
``wisdom, meekness (or modesty), and fear, (i.e. of God,)
and hatred of mammon, (or money,) love of truth, and to
have the love of men, and to be masters of a good name (or
to be of good report).''
But the judge in the text, came greatly short of these
qualifications: his character follows,
which feared not God, neither regarded man;
according to the canon, was disqualified from being a judge, since he
was destitute of the fear of God; and seeing he regarded not men, he
could neither have any love to men, nor any share in the affections
of men, and such an one is very unfit to be a judge, for he cannot be
thought to have any regard to his conscience, or his credit, and so
not to justice and equity. The former of these characters, is what
belongs to every man in a state of unregeneracy; there is no true
fear of God before the eyes, or in the heart of any unconverted man;
wherever it is, it is put there by the grace of God: this is one of
the first things which appears in conversion, and shows itself in an
hatred of sin, and in the performance of duties; and is increased by
the discoveries of the grace and goodness of God; but the want of
this is more visible in some than in others: some, though they have
not the grace of fear, yet are under some awe of the Divine Being,
and pay a regard to the word of God; and what through the force of
education, and the dictates of a natural conscience, dare not go such
lengths in sin, as some do: but there are others, who even say there
is no God, and at least live as if there was none; they endeavour to
work themselves, and others, into a disbelief of the being of God;
and set their mouths against heaven, deny his providence, and despise
his word; stretch out their hands, and strengthen themselves against
the Almighty; and in a fearless manner, run upon the thick bosses of
his bucklers; they declare their sin as Sodom, and hide it not, yea,
glory in it; they promise themselves impunity, and laugh at a future
judgment; and of such a cast was this judge, and therefore a very
improper person for such an office; for civil magistrates, and rulers
of every sort, ought to be just, ruling in the fear of God: and as
for the other part of his character, it is not to be wondered at; for
such that fear not God, will have little regard to men; no otherwise,
or further, than they are obliged to it: indeed, judges ought not to
regard men in judgment; that is, to respect the persons of men, and
through affection, or flattery, or bribes, wrest judgment: but this
is not the sense of the phrase here, since this agrees not with the
other part of the character, and since he is called an unjust judge;
but the meaning is, that he had no regard to the laws of men, any
more than the laws of God; but made his own will the rule of his
actions, and had no regard to doing justice between man and man; nor
did he care what any man said of him; he had no concern about his
reputation and character, having none to lose.
F12 Maimon. Hilch. Sanhedrin, c. 1. sect. 3, 4.
F13 lb. c. 2. sect. 10, 11.
F14 T. Hieros, Sanhedrin, fol. 18. 1.
F15 T. Bab. Sanhedrin, fol. 5. 1.
F16 Maimon. Hilch. Sanhedrin, c. 2. sect. 7.
The New John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible Modernised and adapted for the computer by Larry Pierce of Online Bible. All Rightes Reserved, Larry Pierce, Winterbourne, Ontario.
A printed copy of this work can be ordered from: The Baptist Standard Bearer, 1 Iron Oaks Dr, Paris, AR, 72855
Gill, John. "Commentary on Luke 18:2". "The New John Gill Exposition of the Entire Bible". <http://classic.studylight.org/com/geb/view.cgi?book=lu&chapter=018&verse=002>. 1999.